You Don’t Want To Go Down This Road Do You? (An Essay?)

Up until recent years when it came to politics in all its senses and social issues in all their sense I could be pretty judgemental and unforgiving, some times from A Left perspective (there are dozens, upon dozens of them) I was journeying down a totalitarian state re-education of ‘offenders’ road. At the same time in that way Humans do I was being very worried about the extreme views of others. After a while an old saw ‘Well I know I am right’ just wasn’t sounding as solid as it used to. This post is not not so much one solid argument but a collection of musings based on recent evidence- although Truth Be Known I should have learnt this earlier. This will be a journey with Tricky Issues and ‘Questions’

Do Those Folk Realise How That Makes Them Sound?
Naturally it wouldn’t be a good old Warning Post if there wasn’t some censorious commentary, but be careful there will be a sting in the tail.
Anyway let’s consider some of the statements and sentiments I have encountered of late.
1. FaceBook
There was this post about a fellow being attacked and killed by a shark. What I couldn’t figure out were the Likes and Laughing emojis. I posted that up in Comments. To be told that it was because the event took place is Israel and the guy was either an Israeli or a visiting fellow religionist.
Oh for (bad word)’s sake! Was my reaction. Whichever way you look at their reaction apart from being cruelly insensitive it was racist. They knew nothing about the victim, and yet because they were currently horrified by the Israel Government they thought it fair sport to vilify and cheer when a person with a tenuous link died. That actually puts them in exactly the same mind set as that government and its supporters, and it is no use trying to wriggle out of the charge.
Don’t worry little starving traumatised Palestinian Orphan, for I have laughed about possibly Jewish man being eaten by a shark. There does that not make you feel better?’  -Yeah,..right.
2. FaceBook
One of the anti-theist sites. A place where folk whose knowledge of the Faith and the Bible is somewhat limited. I started visiting one because being bemused by their lack of understanding. The conversations are never an exchange of views, I ask a question about their statement, they make an accusation. Anyway in one brief exchange where the fellow was saying how bad the faith was and all of the priests and preachers were bad too. I asked him how did he feel about say Maximilian Klobe  who volunteered to die in place of a stranger in Auschwitz. His response was ‘even bad people do good sometimes’, and then he hurried on with more condemnations. That was one big wall of a statement, to have a view that unconditionally judges everyone on the other side as ‘bad’. A bit like racists who hurriedly say ‘Oh, I know there are some good ones’

Basically we have two examples there, originating from points of view, ie Against the excesses of Israel & questioning the unconditional belief in a God – broadly both of which are seen to be liberal and progressive. And yet amongst all the genuine people with constructive beliefs, who would take issue with Intolerance and Hatred there lurk a minority who embrace exactly those shortcomings in their own outlooks.
We have to ask ourselves. At some stage, at some time, on some subject ‘did I stray down similar paths?’ We can point a finger at FaceBook and other media sites and try to blame them and say ‘we’ don’t use them, anymore; then we have to ask ‘but have I espoused such comments elsewhere?’
It gets more complex.
In this first sub-heading you will note certain elements of condemnation and judgement. Now I can say in my defence, I chose my ground carefully and made my comments with elements of qualification. The trouble there is, we get a bit of a conundrum. In writing these words have I given some folk ammunition to take issue with all critics of Israel and all atheists? It was not my intention, but the tricky thing with writing ‘stuff’ in public is that you never know how the reader is going to react. Therefore dear reader, these words are an example of a door swinging both ways Writer and Reader – Reader and Writer. And sometimes the Writer’s time-honoured lament ‘That’s not what I meant’ sounds just a bit weedy to someone who was injured by the commentary.
In short – we should always be careful how we write what we write and how we read what we read.
That’s why this portion was so long. Arguably the qualifiers took up more time and space than the message. And yet? Did it wholly get across?
We all carry ‘baggage’ in these turbulent times. And it is not always easy to balance between ethically justifiable statements and downright vilification. They seem to be polar opposites, but amongst our many Human flaws we have adopted as a weapon ‘Justification’

 

The Whispering Which Leads to Shouting (What We Think, Not Always Saying)
Anger
: There are times when most of us cringe as we go through a ‘What Was I Thinking?’ interlude. Where through a combination of circumstances maybe on one bad day, or which have been building up we just lose control, and either embarrass or scare ourselves. We do try to keep those times under wraps, but…..but.

Anyway we shall talk anymore about those; shall we? We move onto the other side of Anger, the part we institutionalise, within ourselves. A place which is not neatly boxed up but is a tangle, a sprawl of urban ruins or a jungle long left to grow of its own accord. Where we go to when something or someone who represents something comes to our attention and triggers a reaction. We might well sound off on some outlet and craft our opinion into a fairly reasonable comment in mature and restrained language, because we do not want to come across as one of ‘the ignorant, ill-informed masses’, we value our opinions and views too much. And that is laudable insofar as it goes.
Yet at this stage the question we need to ask ourselves is. Where does the motivation come from?
Have we checked our views just to make sure they are up to date? Is that quotation correct in word and attribution? Are those ‘facts’ we are quoting actually ‘facts’? What was the source? Do we feel that strongly about our point of view, or are we just so much against the other we’ll grab any ammunition?
For the challenge we face here is not so much the issue we are against or defending. It is how we view those on the opposite side of the fence. And who built that fence anyhow?
So coming this far. How do we feel about the opposition? Not just the vocal or the loud ones, or the ones who are in it for the material gain. I am referring to the vast majority of the opposition. The ones you would walk by the street and unless they were wearing something to advertise their allegiance, you wouldn’t know would you? Mercy forbid that you have actually formed in that place which is not neatly boxed  a profile of an opposition supporter. Well you stoutly deny that, you do not think that they all look or dress or sound like……What?. And yet another niggling question is, have you formed an idea of what type of person they are? And how does that work?
Well distance for starters. It is far easier to be suspicious of someone who you know nothing about apart from one casual label, than a person who is just an average member of the community, steady family person, employed, and well kind of likeable?
It kind of spoils the place where you secretly go, to know out there, there might actually be basically ‘Good People’ who just see the world differently to you. You can of course reason that their choices are threatening your way of Life; the problem there being they can say that to you too. Does that stop you banding together and asking what’s being done about those potholes in the main road into through and out of town?

A Resolution? Maybe?
The Divisions are once more even bigger and better these days. There is and always has been a whole industry built around making sure they stay that way. Its practitioners are either feasting on Hate and Division because it keep them sharp, or they are getting high on the Vanity Kick on account of the number of likes and followers they are harvesting, OR, they are just getting plain wealthy from the kickbacks they get through the Media Outlets in pursuit of subscribers and advertising revenues. Here is a question? How much come from our own strong beliefs or how much are we being used? That’s another tricky one. You might say it is an unfair one to ask- fair enough question my motivation, my first response will be ‘Now you are getting it’
Question, analyse, study, think, conclude. Position yourself by all means. Then when you meet someone of the opposite view, look for the common ground, both of you and place your feet firmly there and resolve to work this ground and harvest its richer crop.
It’ll be tough. But then the worthwhile always comes with that price.

 We still have some time folks.

As Good A Time As Any

18th February 2026 is for some parts of the Christian Faith the commencement of Lent; a solemn observance prior to Easter. Dates and practices vary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lent 
By happy synchronicity of calendars this year, the Islamic Ramadan commenced of the 17th February 2026
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramadan 
Both as solemn times of fasting, penitence, religious observation and spiritual reflection. And in consequence seem a good time to write a reflective post across a broad spectrum.   

 

On Human Flaws
There are many some are small niggly little things with a potential to get out of control on the local level- loud music being a classic. Some with a capacity to spread wreckage far and wide. This post is about one which is sometimes a starter all of its own, while other times is brought into the mix.
Conflict 

As we know it can start anywhere, anyhow, anybody. Its causes are myriad, mostly political, misuse of religion, race, greed and social differences. At the lower end it is conducted these days on Social Media, or on The Streets, at the other end on The Battlefield. Sometimes those who claim to be leaders or want to be are the cause, and going back to the other extreme it will be what’s called a grass roots movement of division or discontent that some opportunists will be only to willing to bring their carpet bag or medicine show wagon to.
Thanks to the proliferation of Social Media it often needs only a label or a slogan to get the whole thing rolling and roiling. And constructive thought or true critical thinking does not come into the process – heck those two are quite the encumbrance to Conflict on account of asking that difficult question:
WHY

Now by that I don’t mean ‘Why’ two groups or people are yelling, shouting, threatening, hitting, missile-ing at each other. We know that, the parties strongly don’t get on, feel threatened, fear what the other side represent. That’s the Old Story. I mean the other tricky deeper question WHY ‘the parties strongly don’t get on, feel threatened, fear what the other side represent’ . How did it get to this stage? Never mind what the leaders, pundits, loudmouths, fast buck merchants and Social Media, YouTube, Instagram, X Tik-Tok and whatever other platform stirrers, influencers, I Want More Than Five Minutes of Fame peddlers are pushing. I mean how did YOU, THEY ,US, THEM get here- now? Because to be honest no one in a bright shiny uniform along with a few others in not so bright and shiny equivalents came up to your door said ‘You’re drafted.’ hauled you off, uniformed you up, gave you a weapon and pointed you in the direction of the foe with an instruction to do harm. No YOU,THEY, US,THEM we all signed up as fast as we could. And we could not wait to get at the foe.
At this stage you should be somewhat aggrieved with me and pointing out that there was a Good Cause for YOU, WE to feel this way and it’s because THEY ,THEM are the way THEY are, it’s all their fault.
All their fault?
The supposition amongst the anger and rage is that one side has at least a majority holding in the Ethical and even Practical stakes, while the others are just shorn of all senses and perceptions.
Harsh?
Well since both sides are calling out those shots there is a suggestion the situation is jagged.
Let’s go down to the micro-level to the folk who pay the dues        

 

Those Who Care (About Something)
Everyone has opinions and also have strong beliefs about something or other. Which means at some stage they are going to bump up against those who have the opposite strong beliefs. Now there is a very high likelihood that for a whole slew of reasons neither are ever going to agree.
The question to be asking is – Do WE,YOU,THEY,THEM strongly disagree with everything the people of the other side hold to? Here’s a hardcore example.
Two groups are having a loud ruckus in the street. Suddenly a distressed person is crying for help, distracted with one baby their two other children being kids have got into a boat onto a patch of water, hit something and the boat starting to sink. Do the two groups carry on? Do either of them check out if the parent is on their side of the argument. Or do the whole lot as one group go rushing off to help, form a human chain, or a swim line or anything to help, while others contact the rescue services. I am suggesting here the whole argument gets forgotten and maybe a few tenuous working relationships are formed, because amongst the groups bother will be agreeing that something should have been done about careless leaving of boats at the rickety jetty  and those dangerous bits underwater. You could parallel that with any number of scenarios.(By the way you get social points deducted for trying to blame the parent – they were dealing with the baby and any parent knows if there is something dangerous kids if left unsupervised even for a second will be there!
The point I wish to make is that there is usually some common ground somewhere. I will leave you to imagine less extreme examples.
We all disagree strongly but those who disagree strongly with each will also have common ground. And it is there that we should be, on the common ground, working with the other side, realising some things can be worked through together, while accepting that some won’t.
And won’t those snake oil merchants who trade in conflict hate that? They cannot abide moderation or constructive working together. They want YOU,US,THEM,THEY to be forever divided and filling up their coffers (literally) and ensuring they get the top jobs. 
At this stage…No…I am not going to break out one of those 1960s ‘Let’s All Love Each Other’ songs. I never gave them much store back then when I was teenager and sadly they did not work out either. The nearest anyone got was Lennon/McCartney’s ‘We Can Work It Out’.
Basically time is running out, and there’s too much Conflict . Work together and at the end of the day go home and maybe say ‘Geez I can work fine with them but if I lived with them I swear…..’ 
It’s a start.
Together on The Common Ground.

Take care folks.    

PS: This might be the start of a sort of series of reflective style posts over this (for me) Lenten season.
Not sure yet. We’ll see.

PS II – I don’t know how this will look to you, but I can’t be responsible for where WP is putting it adverts.
Hopefully they will turn up in reasonably sited places

Roger

Another Warning Out of History

I normally don’t or shouldn’t make particular, targeted appeals to my friends in the USA on matters political. My themes are normally general commentaries, messages of support and overall condemnatory. The rest are left to your good selves.
Here’s one there, short and not so sweet, which originated from this news headline:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g31n4ey9go 
The expiration of the treaty is not news, and there has been, is and will, be much written about it.
My contribution is based on a warning out of History:
The Reinsurance Treaty of 1887 between the Imperial Powers of Germany and Russia, forged by German Chancellor Bismarck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinsurance_Treaty    
In 1890 Bismarck was forced to resign by Kaiser Wilhelm II-

basically because the former was being smarter than the latter (sometimes a few words of flippancy are worth paragraphs of analysis). The Treaty due for renewal was allowed to expire in the same year. A number of historians of World War I cite this as a contributory factor in the growing undercurrents of mutual tensions and suspicions wherein the old diplomatic system failed to operate during the final crisis that erupted in 1914.
That war had a particularly messy ending with an absence of important formal national surrenders; only an jagged Armistice which allowed an extremist conspiracy to foster in Germany which in turn led to World War II. Not that there was much peace between 1918 and 1939.

With this in mind, the next time you have cause to write to any elected official you might want to raise the point concerning the recent expiration. 

Take care everyone
Roger    

 

Oi !! Draft Dodger in the Whitehouse!! This is for YOU!!!!

This should need no introduction. Suffice it to say just when you think that odious, self centred, unpleasant, ignorant creature cannot get any worse; the next day he does.
Yesterday I could not write about his latest without involving very coarse language.
One day and a half I am still ‘spitting’ angry
457 times I write:

Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump Shame on you Trump
Shame on you Trump

OK, I’ve said my piece.

The USA in South America, Once More. Nothing New, Except The President

The USA physically intervenes in a South American state. At the risk of upsetting some at what may seem a cynically laid back view:
Nothing New There.

Quite the heritage in fact. To name a few with varied resources and results
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Wars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contras
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Grenada
There were of course others not in the USA backyard. 

Again all this is nothing new. It’s what imperial powers, or those who like to call ‘the actions’ something else, do. In the Age of Empires: Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Russia, Ottoman Empires, and China were all busy invading or replacing one smaller nation’s rulers with one they liked. You could say it all boils down to International Relations (Even going back to the Classic Greek era- it’s there).

So on the face of it how does the latest USA in this case into Venezuela differ? Threats, intrusions, the abduction or assassination of the leader, well that’s all part of the playbook. Some might say that regime had it coming. The Maduro regime has been tracked by Amnesty International  for a number of years:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/americas/south-america/venezuela/report-venezuela/ 
 Taking into account all those aforementioned events we might even say ‘Business As Usual’.
However…..
For there is always an ‘However

Regime Change (Or Dice Rolling Politics)
Unless you are a brutal authoritarian outfit with a fixation that you need to physically extend your borders going about Regime Change is a process that is always going to have problems that will bedevil your initial decision. To begin with not everyone is going to wave  flags at you as liberators, secondly unpleasant opportunists who have motives venal or political will rise to the surface, and no one native is going to thank you for telling them how to run their nation, and those are just the simple ones which would tax a mature experienced mind. What an emotional, egotistical, unfocused fellow such as Trump would do…you have experience of the treatment of his fellow citizens. You would have thought after Iraq at the start of this decade a lesson might have been learnt….. think again.
So to date officially No American Was Harmed in  the making of this venture and a large number locals are glad to see the back of their own president. You will note though that only the ex-pats felt safe and confident enough to go out on the streets to celebrate. Well so far, so good….right?….. But there’s that Iraq question again….no local liked Sadam Hussain, did they? 
Sorry folk but unlike in the movies we don’t have a final frame and then roll the credits. History doesn’t work like that…..anyway in that movie scenario don’t forget that extra piece at the end in which it shows the ‘villainy’ still hasn’t really gone away…… Should I mention Iraq again, or Afghanistan even? 
Read on…

In The Aftermath (And what comes out in the Aftermath)
Whenever there are major events, the details do not rush out in one blaze of clarity, official statements, journalistic questioning and the occasional verifiable independent witness, they all play their part. Along with the International Reactions.
Now this was not just a case of a US president saying ‘I’ve had enough! Go get that S.O.B’ and everyone dutifully scrambles to one of those Hollywood pre-action planning montages. The latest information indicates this had been a long planned for operation, which maybe with some important internal help went smoothly for America, that is. Please read.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp37yr2xq7no  
This indicates the plan was long in the making, which in turn suggests it was also long in the policy formulation, and likely long in the discussion. If this has its conception back in the previous presidency or even in the Obama tenure I would not be shocked. (don’t forget under whose watch Osama bin Laden was taken out). There is an old saying attributed to several sources, which goes along the lines of ‘There are two things you do not want to see being made. Sausages and International Policy’ (or the other way around). So, did the current president just pick up a loose ball and run with it? I guess historians will clarify.  

Meanwhile we have this piece of good news concerning the release of political prisoners
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0mkwl2g499o
So are my words in the previous Regime Change paragraph unduly pessimistic? Am I just serving up sour grapes because all this is happening with the ‘Wrong’ president, the one of whom the very act giving credit for anything is an anathema?  
Read on

Hubris Plays The Very Long Game
A brief look back to the International Tenure of Tony Blair as UK PM. A seemingly sunny sort of fellow; obviously, annoyingly, very self-confident. His early ventures into the international scene. Kosovo (1999)- Blair was a major advocate for a ground offensive against Slobodan Milošević’s forces. Sierra Leone (2000): A limited but highly successful military intervention that swung the tide against a most vile rebel force in the Sierra Leone Civil War….So far so good. So much so that some sources suggest President George Bush jnr would not have gone into Iraq without Tony Blair’s approval. And then, yes Iraq. And a hero of the vulnerable and fighter against brutality was then labelled as a war criminal.
And now we have Donald Trump as president on whose authority the operation in Venezuela took place….

(Forewarning I have been sort of balanced and restrained thus far, but a guy can only give so much restraint …. Justifiable Rant Warning – Level 12 and rising)
The same fellow who now wants to grab Greenland by any means. Bear in mind this is not some guy shouting out on a phone call-in or rattling out (as we do) on our laptops prior to pressing an ill-advised  ‘Send’.
This is the president of the U-S-A. Who is claiming he wants to have Greenland for the ‘Security’ of because of….
Russia?… Wait a smidge – Doesn’t he understand Russia’s point of view (well some of the time). Or is he changing political socks?
China?…. Now let’s look at the map there. You might recall that China is more focused on the Pacific region, a South-East bit of the world. Beijing at not indicated it is building any artificial islands up in the arctic, a North-West bit of the world. Currently, in China’s play book it is as usual all trade which can be fragile, and the only way China would get boots on the ground would be if Greenland and Denmark backed by a seriously pissed-off Europe did so just to spite the Arch-Brat in Washington
AND Aside from that…
Back to those For Security Purposes. A landgrab off of a NATO partner. How in the name of Sweet Reason is that supposed to aid unified western security?? What happened to the old school? Soft nagging of the government in Copenhagen and waving dollars under their noses, all in the name of security from big, bad Russia. Jeeeeez Loooeezzz back before 2016 you could have given that to a Whitehouse intern to do the initial spade work, before the big names grabbed the credit.
In this case the current Whitehouse gest a big F on their paper (that’s F as in ‘failed’ by the way – I know, I know another word occurred to you too…but let’s keep this family friendly, people?)
Thus….‘Security’ ….Oh yeah…..Big laugh…A bitter one.

And thus I sign off with this final thought.
It is not the SUV that is USA foreign policy that worries me, it is the driver careering around, one foot on the gas and the other one nowhere near the brake, while he is constantly looking over his shoulder at the passengers and yelling ‘Hey lookit me! Some stones…huh??’

Take care of yourselves and everyone close to you. Keep steady.

Seasonal Hand Across The Ether (The Metaphorical Version that is)

Of the 752 images stored on my WP blog, the first entry still seems the most applicable to cover all posts which are sent in a spirit of Friendship and Hope. Hope. Speaking of Hope
Some task huh?
The third decade of the 21st century appears to be one wrapped in gloom, anguish, despair turmoil, and you my dear reader will be able to add your own words to that list. It would seem that the usual toxins of Greed, Violence, Intolerance and Suppression and now joyously aided by Denial and Ignorance they growing frenetic on the social drugs of Conspiracy and Indulgence. This wretched alliance seems more than capable of finally stifling the brief season of instinctive Joy and Goodwill which used to be a theme of Decembers. After all do you really feel like humming, or whistling, even singing to those seasonal songs and carols which still permeate the air waves and public places or does ‘It’s Beginning To Look A Lot Like Christmas’ really stick in your craw this year?
This is the stage of the post when I am supposed to heave-ho on the allegorical Helm and wheel the whole sentiment into one of Joy and of course Hope. After laying out One Hundred and Thirty plus words in doing the exact opposite.
Some task, huh?

We could start with giving ourselves, individually speaking, some space. It is my opinion based on many years’ experience and observation that one problem in the world is whereas the ruthless, selfish, greedy, arrogant folk will very rarely admit to their faults or flaws, ordinary folk are all too willing to blame themselves for much lesser matters as if those were Crimes Against Humanity and by default give the worst of folk wriggle room. Let’s start with those foundational attributes Compassion, Respect and Tolerance (while leaving pop-culture summaries of Nietzsche and his ilk out of it).
Most of us, hereabouts, would like to think that we are predisposed to those qualities, which is something of a plus for Human Nature- we would like to think we are ‘Nice’ (ish). Then we will metaphorically look over our shoulder or maybe agonise over our shortcomings. Now, whereas, it is only right for us avoid being smug, self-congratulatory and hypocritical there are also times when we will wince and think ‘Urgh. That could have gone better’ or ‘What the heck was I thinking of’ . Which is fine, because most of us have an analytical system working there. However:
Compassion– Do you care for those you have not met, but feel because of their situation as a minority or a currently persecuted section or a unfortunate one of a few, that what is being heaped on them is just not fair. That they have been labelled and you, I, us know nothing about them as persons and the negative attention is all unjust. Is that your default position? Well give yourself some credit then. By not embracing Disdain, Suspicion or Apathy, by supporting, or at least not joining in with the mob; there is Compassion in you.
Mind you Compassion makes tough calls on you. How about those folk you have labelled?…. Yeah I know…..Yeah boy do I know…..Still as long as you don’t want all of them incarcerated in a ‘place of correction’ as long as you find that disturbing…. Well keep on keeping on…

Respect– Do you know or have ever countered folk or a community or a people, whose views or ways you do not agree with, or even not understand, and yet your only response is ‘Yes, not for me, couldn’t be like that’ And yet you feel they have a certain something or somethings within their outlooks which merits an understanding and acceptance. Now that should not be the unconditional sort of, like everyone within that group should not be criticised- for every circle has its jerks (yes that was deliberate-stop sniggering at the back). To do that is to condemn the rest by allowing abuse and domination by unpleasant characters. In the individual case it gets even more complex because you may find there are times when an individual has been a complete idiot in one instance over their beliefs but not in every facet. Respect is an even tougher caller than Compassion. But if you can disagree with a view (not necessarily an act) and allow that person their opinion (I know…I know….we are coming to the qualifier when discussing Tolerance). If you can least understand someone’s stance and agree to disagree or Live and Let Live. Are you trying to balance that, but wobble just a bit in the balance? Well it’s something to work with. You are doing well though, just keep working.

   

Tolerance-This is the deal breaker of the trio. It requires an ability to accept those whose views are opposite to yours and whose comments might even set your teeth on edge. However the door swings both ways in that they must react the same way. You do not have to accept those who espouse Intolerance and Hatred, to be biblical and refer to  the teachings of Jesus Christ –  Matthew 10:4 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet. This is a fairly allegorical piece of advice. Turn your back on Intolerance and its poisons. Well yes do not expect that balance to be easy. There will always be those places when you get tested to the absolute limit. Oh for the simple loud mouthed bigot, you say, and not this quiet sincere person who speaks in a rational calm way. And yet do you struggle on to make with conversation and contact, even if failing the first, second, third time? Do you ever give up on one attempt but still say ‘Next time. Next time it will go better,’  

The measurement is in your willingness never to in your heart give up on these three. To just keep on trying to spread them, trying to bring people into the fold, try and try and even when it all goes wrong ,you try some more. And never, ever give up on yourself for trying


And there you are. For doing those few efforts – You are worth it

You are not perfect. But You are worth it.
Bear that in mind this Season. Give yourself a smile, a nod and a whispered Well it might have gone better. But next time. Yeah next time,’.

Best of wishes and hopes to you all; Christmas, Holiday, Looking to 2026 whatever. 

An Explanation and Something of a Justification

I cannot quite place which of the Laurel & Hardy films Olly looks at Stan in that wonderful exasperated expression and asks ‘What did you do that for?’ . It seems to fit the theme of the post though.

Preamble 
I have long forgotten what my ‘WP Name’ was when first starting out on WP some fourteen years ago. All went well until between them WP & Kismet turned my replies to other posts into either unknown or spam. Neither would not admit to a flaw or offer an apology and would refer me to the other. That PAID FOR account was closed down and I set up a new  FREE account (Are you reading this WP?).
Anyway, simmering from the previous treatment I chose the name ‘determineddespiteWP’ as my  ‘name’ in thinking a point was being made, if only to myself.
And there it was for years and years and years. Quite forgotten, to the extent when folk replied to me by the name ‘determined’ for a few moments there would be no recognition until the ‘Oh Yeah’ kicked in.

The Build Up
The original reason for joining WP was to raise my writing profile and interact with other Indy writers. However (there is always an ‘However’), once involved with the ‘back and forth’ and dipping into random posts which caught the attention of my political side, I became involved in that track…….. Bound to happen.
And gradually, then at an increasing pace the folk being followed and my own posts took on a majority political slant; there was even a second site given over to politics but that withered a bit. The writer in me lamented…loudly at times…but despite a few public announcements there would be no more politics it did not take much for me to slip back to political views as a theme.
Now being a reader of histories, historical references and allegories tended to abound in my writing….. Here comes another ‘However’…….. Most of the my favoured subject matter were Military Histories along with the associated political causes and effects; and when wars are involved there are certainly no happy beginnings or middles and very rarely any truly satisfactory much less happy endings. This leaves an inveterate reader of these histories with a certain outlook. Some might call it ‘Realistic’, some might compliment you with ‘Incisive’ , others might simply suggest ‘Gloomy’ of ‘Judgemental’ – I would not argue with the latter.
Thus my posts or responses were along the lines of ‘It’s Happening Again. And Won’t Turn Out Well,’   or very censorious observations on the flaws in Human Nature. 
This outlook resulted in one recent throwaway line ‘Call me Cassandra’ used in a response to another’s post and they took up the challenge. I could not leave well alone.

Rationale 
Whereas the name has its origins in the Greek Mythologies around events in Troy, I cannot, truly identify with this most unhappy young trojan prophetess or her life. That would be, when examining the detail, downright ridiculous and weird. My allusion is with the common modern assumption that the name is all to do with very ominous predictions which many might feel extreme. BUT also and more to the point the popular British newspaper journalist William Connor, who headed his column with this name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Connor   

In this there is a certain amount, albeit presumptuous dignity.  

Conclusion
My blog will still remain though  
Writing Despite Computers and Programmes
For this seems to be a common missions statement for most Bloggers hereabouts.

File this under ‘Just Saying. That’s All’ 

Best wishes to you all.
Roger

Don’t You Hate It When Ethics Calls You Out

Foreword: You are not going to like it…..No more that I do.

Often we will talk about Ethics, normally about someone who is being unethical. We will wield the word as a weapon in a just war, pointing out someone’s most grievous faults and actions, and we feel good about it.
We might, at some stage become involved in a discussion over the nature of Ethics and cite either hypothetical or historical events to support our views and naturally our political opinions.
We are in someway comfortable in these encounters, because there are degrees of separation from the actual daily encounters with Ethics
And then.
One day.
We are called out because of an event, and not a simple one like being critical of a politician or inhabitant of that world because they had said something we don’t agree with. Oh no, we don’t get off that easy, for the event has taken place in the grey and jagged area of Conflicting Beliefs, and Ethics itself has come calling asking very difficult questions of us. We wish it hadn’t.

Right now there is hope that the one conflict situation which has been The Many-Layered Big Global News event of the past two years might be coming to an end. Folk living in the Gaza region may be given a chance to not to fear that they may be killed today or tomorrow. Folk living in Israel might be reunited with their hostaged loved ones. The guns, for the moment may be laid down.
And we may give out with an expression of relief.
It would be so simple to embrace that ideal and feel good, save for one niggling detail.
Not only did it happen on President Donald Trump’s watch, it would seem his personal intervention has played a major role in this Peace Effort. The evidence might indicate that through his personal drive and characteristics he has steam rollered all parties into agreeing.
And Ethics stands at our door, barring our way out of the room and asks ‘Well?’
Don’t we wish Ethics had gone next door to ask that question.

Regular readers and I. We have spent the past nine or so years vilifying Trump. We have castigated his past, torn apart his judgements, pounced on his every word rounded on his appointees, associates, high profile supporters, family members and anyone else who came into our sights. We were justified in that we saw the whole miasma surrounding him has a threat to the basic stability of the USA and a threat to democracy. And when you look back on the past and in more detail the recent record we have a solid case. What good ever came from that collection of fundamentalists, prejudicial Conspiracy junkies and snake oil opportunists.
Right?


I made frequent use of adapting Churchill’s comment on the stance of supporting Communist USSR in 1941 ‘If Hitler invaded Hell, I would make at least a favourable reference of the Devil in the House of Commons.’ changing that to ‘If Trump said the World was round, I would at least do Flat Earth believers the common courtesy of visiting their internet sites,’ (and variations). After all what practical good has Trump ever done for Humanity in general?
Right?

So what is our response to this recent event? Trump linked to an Humanitarian Initiative? Do we start looking for the flaws, seeking some gratification in realising by our exacting standards it is not going to work? Do we go down the common train of thought, what does Trump think is in it for him, maybe it is just a colossal Vanity project enabling him to stamp his name favourably into History? Maybe, perhaps, just this once we’ll go scampering off down a Conspiracy Route? Or is our response a rather sour feeling that Trump should not get credit on the World Stage for anything; never mind what, how and that a ravaged and persecuted population should benefit?  

And while we jump to deny that Trump could never, ever under any circumstance be associated with any good idea, anywhere, anyhow, Ethics is still there, at our door.

Herein lies our problem. The conundrum. The person who is currently at the head of an administration which seems intent on dismantling Democracy and Tolerance in the USA, is associated with a Life Saving measure in The Middle East. Broadly this is nothing new. History has its catalogue of individuals renowned for some positive achievement who also have a weight of questionable if not downright hideous actions to their name: Stalin being a classic case and whatever historical heroes you might have there will be very questionable actions linked to them. This one however is happening right here, right now before our very eyes, when we have invested so much in our one stance.

Therefore, do we, for the sake of thousands of Palestinians give Trump some grudging approval, nay even support? If we care that much for them should we consider it, shift just a smidge? Hope it will work out for the best? Put aside our differences, on this one isolated issue?

Or do we remain knowingly entrenched? Reckoning it will only be a question of time before the whole thing falls apart like some political Ponzi scheme, and it was only a Trump effort to win a Nobel Peace prize, no more than that- we knew it!!……And we heave a secret sigh of relief. Well yes, the continued loss of Palestinian lives would be unfortunate, horrific of course, but at least we were right about Trump.
And is that what matters??
No we say, we have a bigger picture to consider. The quality of lives and wellbeing of millions are at risk here. We can’t let down our guard, we think to ourselves. We say, we cannot celebrate. There are greater issues at stake. This is all a ruse. It’s all you need to know about Trump, we argue. He cannot be trusted.
Ethics is still standing at our doors…..Waiting.  
For our Churchillian moment?   
Don’t expect a definitive answer from me I’ve retreated behind another phrase…
‘Just saying. That’s all’

Try Not To Do Selective Outrage. (An Appeal)

Sudan a nation riven by internal conflicts from more than since the 1950s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanese_Civil_War

And on the 15th April 2023 things became even worse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudanese_civil_war_(2023%E2%80%93present)

A land where mass killings, rape and roving brutal gangs masking as militias do as they please, preying on hapless civilians. These are daily events  heart-breaking horrors which basically the Western populations have not bothered about much. You can even be told off for mentioning it, as distracting from other calamities.

Consider these figures taken from the Wikipedia link:

  • Likely significantly more than 150,000 total killed
  • More than 700,000 children with acute malnutrition (with 522,000 likely being dead)[
  • 8,856,313 internally displaced
  • 3,506,383 refugees

And now between 250,000 to 300,000 are trapped in El-Fasher while militia forces close in, forces that see these people as foes.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8wzzjze8xo

Now the thorny part.
We know full well about the horrors which are taking place in Gaza. We see that a right-wing nationalistic fundamentalist government backed by an ultra violent section of the population are running free of most restraints and are taking war to the ultimate most extreme sort – elimination of the foe from its land. And people have taken to the streets and social media in protest. Because Israel and the Middle East always attracts news headlines and attention.   
People are naturally horrified by what is taking place.
So I will ask of you. Why doesn’t Sudan warrant the same reaction?
Why are there no marches or protests?
The BBC News (much maligned by some activist groups) has kept up a steady stream of items. So has Al -Jazeera. PBS, CNN, ABC in the USA have reported on it. Newspaper columnists have drawn attention to it. There is a steady output of appeals from Aid Agencies and Charities on Social Media. The campaigning group Avaaz is currently running an appeal for signatures.
And yet…and yet..
Where is the Western Public Display of Outrage and Horror? 

And there are more out there, maybe not as large but as equally horrifying for the people living through them.
Need to know more? Here’s one window.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/armed-conflict/ 

Of course you my dear reader cannot be everywhere physically marching, you can’t contribute to every appeal, you can’t be emotionally invested in every one of the conflicts across this world, you’d be frazzled out in a month.
Spare a thought once in a while for those suffering, everywhere across the globe, day in day, lament for them from time to time and if you have a spare few ‘coins’ choose one charity to donate to. Make it your business to have at least an idea of the series of conflicts taking place. You don’t have a working knowledge of each one, that’s not possible unless you are a professional.

But at least care. And stay Woke.

Orem, Utah, 10th September 2025

If you live outside of the USA and until today have not heard of Charlie Kirk, then chances are you will by now. A far right activist favoured by Trump and on the 10th September 2025 slain by a currently unknown gunman. In the eyes of The Right now elevated from a favoured son into a Martyr and a Hero. And unless you are someone devoted to the MAGA and Trump, where do you start?

There is a mirrored synchronicity of 9/11 unfolding. Firstly, because what would normally be a day of solemn reflection and for many recollections of where they were has now turned into another media event which will have effects on America. Although this one could have far greater repercussion, 9/11 tore at America’s heart and soul, this assassination has the capacity to shake a foundations already weakening by a series of other quakes. So where do you start?

Are you saddened at another loss of life through violence and worried for the future?
Are you angered and in mourning from a bright young man taken from you?
Are you fearful for you and yours at the random backlash by an extreme Right Wing has a propensity for violence, encouraged by a volatile president?
Are you just satisfied, taking a ‘Game On Stance’; even if it is only secured away in a small place in your being and will only be let out in some long coded way?
Are you detached with a ‘Those Who Live By The Sword Die By The Sword’ outlook?
Or are you far enough gone to just rejoice?

In writing this being British but essentially ‘intolerant of Intolerance’ I am detached. There are qualifiers though. Spare at least a thought.
For his wife Erika who was watching the event and his children, one old enough to possibly perceive some of what is happening. There is a pain none of us should ever wish upon anyone.
For those youngsters witnessing a close up killing who will have that image branded on their minds. Their innocence ripped away from them and Reality ground into their souls.
For those of his family and true friends, who have lost someone close.

As I write this, the breaking news on BBC is that the FBI have a weapon, possible forensic evidence and now they have an image of the Person of Interest. Whether this will result in a rapid detention remains to be seen. Sudden assumptions would have been made along the ‘Grassy Knoll’ line and the Conspiracy Industry would have gone into overdrive. We could have been forgiven for thinking the assassin was one with professional experience, the accuracy of that shot?  Along comes The Action Film scene through a scope, the shot and then camera to the face of a hardened veteran looking grim and stealing away. Instead, we might have to consider a young loner with an agenda, who was aiming for the head but hit the throat.

Motivations? One volunteer of an extremist group?  One truly lone gunman? Just looking to kill one particular target? Or seeking the chance to throw one final match on a forest of folk tinder-dry through polarisation and start the urban war the shooter yearns? Or maybe some disenchanted MAGA member? Or maybe just someone looking to make a play for infamy? Or someone so far out anyone with a profile would do?

Whoever and whatever. In a year with so far 150+ acts deemed as political violence this one comes perilously close to setting off a whole sequence of events, the parallel of which sits back in 1914 in a town with its named etched into history, Sarajevo and a previously inconsequential fellow Gavrilo Princip. Would that I might be just one person writing alarmist rhetoric. But I am not am I? A fear which has been simmering amongst Americans since Trump first got into the Whitehouse will have been notched up.

And I worry for you all.
For those who do not want violence at all; the innocents are always the first, last and most to suffer.
For those who dally with the idea of violence, because unless you have been in a place riven by communal violence you seriously do not know what you are dealing with.
For those who dream about violence, are you ready to live as people did in Northern Ireland for thirty plus years, never who is at your door, checking underneath and all over your car?

There is one person who I have no sympathy for and that is your president. He has dallied with violence, he has made NO appeal to those who did not vote for him, he has poured forth irrational invective. If he had cared so much for Charlie Kirk then why did he not use his presidential power to ensure the man had some more efficient security? Somebody else has died for you Trump. Because of your ego, your vanity, your stupidity. And I fear they will not be the last.

For my friends in the USA
For those I exchange views with,
For those I do not know, but just want a quiet life,
For those who will loose their innocence.
For those who will see their dreams turn to nightmares
I worry and fear for you