
It started yesterday with this post.
Why?
In a very short space of time the above popped up in my notifications. I was bemused. Did this means that WP’s AI was taking an interest in me (along with lots of others, let’s be realistic). For whimsical reasons I just could not leave this alone. It simply begged a reply, nay a response even.
The first things that struck me was the phrase ‘a palindrome of 100 or more’. I reckon more than a few steeped in English Philology would argue about the words ‘palindrome of…‘ maintain that the said is not ‘Of’ anything; it just is….and there would be a counter argument. What fun.
The second thing which was a really serious issue to my UK Civil Service trained mind. A post of (say) 1221 words (or 1331 or 1441 etc etc). Now. Where does the count start?
At the Title
At the body of the post
OR
After this introduction???
Dear Reader This is not just frivolity or pedantry . For all I know the AI will be keeping a check on the words, because apparently there is a reward. A badge or something of significance in an Internet / Social Media (Scoff ye not, some influencers get substantial sums for mentioning products on their sites). The only solution was to go Civil Service on it and judge that the post starts on the first word of the title, on the basis that the title is an integral part of the post. Thus I am 257 words into the post already; 21.0483% of a post 1221 word post. How hard can this be?
Overview
Machines were mice.
Men were lions
Once upon a time
But now it’s the opposite
It’s twice upon a time
These seemingly quirky words from the opening of Moondog’s 1970 orchestral work Stamping Ground, stayed in my head throughout that most challenging and stressful era which started in the mid 1980s. The general move from a clerically based method of office working to one computer driven, and the realisation that, we the ones at the desk end of the jobs could no longer navigate around some of the more unhelpful and unnecessary strictures placed upon us by remote folk. The computer was there, initially to do their bidding, but slowly and with more pace it has gained traction. You may or may not have heard of a book published in 2025 warning of the dangers of Super AI ‘If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies’ by Eliezer Yudkowsky & Nate Soares. This is not the place to discuss said book (a separate post if ever there was one!). However. There is a great degree of not so latent hostility to AIs. THUS I ask myself will any readership this post attracts be content with me not being polemical about any subject matter relating to AI generated ‘stuff’. Maybe not, mine is a modest blog and does not cause a flicker in Social Media. Therefore I can write what a durn well please on this what I see as a particularly amusing subject.
So What?
Just referring back to that 2025 book and a spasm of comments on Social Media, it seems I should not be taking things lightly, even some would say frivolously. After all, is it not so that everything we input electronically onto a website or even our laptop will be recorded and filed away in Computer memories, to be analysed, utilised and weaponised at some later date. Apparently.
Well I guess there are folk who would like to think that they should be concerned in case a Computer System is watching their every move. Good for their egos I suppose.
Me? Not really. No doubt all my purchasing, viewing, listening, commenting, interacting, and subscribing stuffs are collected somewhere, along with everything else. Me and a few billion others.
And along comes WP and it wants me to play games with it. Should I feel offended.
Again, I input onto my laptop and blog…Me? Not really. It’s a bit of a diversion isn’t it? And not dissimilar to WP’s daily prompts which a number of folk enjoy or feel motivated by (Err…I keep forgetting about it. Ooops)
Yeah. Let’s Play WP
But, WHY you ask? Why should I take part in some sort of strategy, Marketing maybe?. Should I be here and now involving myself in what WP’s AI obviously has programmed or been programmed to do. Have I become but a mouse running up and down a cyber maze in the hope of getting some electronic cheese, or whatever rewards mice actually?
Now there’s a thought. Apparently not – sweet foods, grains, nuts and likewise are their go to; strong cheeses could even offend their very sensitive sense of smell.
And there’s another thought. In my desire to check for authenticity I checked this on the internet and learnt something new.
Or did I?
Could it be, dear reader that somewhere a Computer Programme has been evolving the intent of which is to spread the idea that mice do not like cheese? But what purpose would that serve you say? WELL…I input once again….WELL..How do well know this is not all part of a very long term strategy to believe information found on the net. Because friends, is it not so that everyone just loves to find out that some conventional wisdom is not so. Ah-ha! We go…I knew it! Clever old me for thinking to check on that.
But….BUT my follower, is that not the case that Computer Programmes want us to do, The Mice / Cheese relationship validity is not important. The fact that you, I, the, we went to the Internet to check is the important thing. Who goes to a library to check anymore? Ha! You might say. Would my local library have information on the dietary habits of mice? Probably, once upon a time.
Now..?
Is It Twice Upon A Time?
At this stage you should be muttering, shouting or inputting along the lines of ‘I object. You started off this sub-heading with an ethical question, and then suddenly you veered off on some madcap rant about Cheese and Mice and Computer Programmes. What is that supposed to represent, other than a mindless trivial rant’
Well.
From‘Now’ to ‘Time?’ that totalled up 224 words (and maybe dots…I didn’t check). And That’s the easiest bit of stream of consciousness writing I have indulged in for a long time, which put me closer to 1221 with no effort at all.
Also you can now ask yourself.
Was he actually being satirical about the subject of alarmist of conspiracy charged writings or commentaries?
Maybe he was just being loveably silly and screwball in the style of 1930s comedy films?
OR…OR was he actually making a pertinent comments in an ‘Off The Wall’ way . For he did not end that section by referencing once more Moondog’s ‘Stamping Ground?
I leave that up to, you. While I count up the words from ‘At this stage’
181 and the rest of this sentence. This stuff writes itself I tell you! Which takes me to 918 words-920 this could on and on.(925) add to the 257 at the introduction made 1182 (1186)
Ending
Word counting is fun but if taken to excess is cheating (1216)
I say farewell then everyone














